Alemania
Confrontations
Jesse Simon
The
thorny questions of interpretation and the complex historical baggage
associated with Aida have done little
to diminish its popularity … and perhaps that is as it should be: the
opera’s undeniable qualities – it includes some of Verdi’s most lucid
late-period writing and offers a nuanced take on the perennial Verdian triangle
of love, family and country – have allowed it to function on the level of
entertainment, even as its setting and action offer a springboard for inquiries
of greater conceptual depth. Certainly the new production at the Staatsoper
Unter den Linden did not shy away from difficult themes: the staging, directed
by Calixto Bieito, pushed the story’s war atrocities and nationalistic pageantry
to the fore and gave them an unsettlingly recognisable modern edge; however the
succession of intensely-focussed confrontations brought to life by the
evening’s formidable cast ensured that the pleasures of the opera were given
equal prominence.
Perhaps
the most surprising thing about Mr Bieito’s staging was how relatively
straightforward it was. This is not to suggest it was set in the time of the
Pharaohs, nor, for that matter, in any recognisable location beyond the vaguely-defined
present day; but for a director whose stagings often thrive on imagery ranging
from confrontational to wilfully obscure, his Aida was taut, cleanly
executed and remarkably approachable. To be sure, much of its militaristic
iconography, designed to evoke the horrors of modern armed conflict, infused
the action with a sense of constant dread, and some of the ideas that appeared
on stage, while obviously well-considered, seemed to come from a complex network
of allusion and reference that was not always accessible to the wider audience.
Yet the staging as a whole, seemed governed by its own irrefutable logic.
Much
of the action was set within a clean, brightly-lit white room. While Mr Bieito
had his own extratextual agenda – colonial expansion is bad; unchecked
capitalism is bad; wars of expansion undertaken in the interests of capitalism
are definitely bad – his arguments were made more through props, costumes and
tastefully restrained use of video projection than through the wholesale
transposition of the story into a familiar modern milieu. The first act set the
scene with relative subtlety: during the prelude Radamès exchanged his velvet
smoking jacket for camo fatigues and his loafers for army boots; assault rifles
made a prominent appearance in the solemn preparations for war that concluded
the act.
The
staging’s arguments came into sharper focus during the second act: the
confrontation of Amneris and Aida took place in a room hung with innumerable pelts
from zebras, leopards and other exotic animals from the plains of Africa. The
triumphal march and ballet was accompanied by black and white footage of
elephants helping to tow a safari jeep through a river – a brilliantly subtle
dig at those attracted to Aida solely by the promise of spectacle – and
concluded by turning the final chorus into the giddy celebration of a populace
preparing to strip a conquered nation of its wealth, its resources and,
presumably, its soul.
Mr
Bieito’s attempts to highlight the the fiscal roots of military-political
conflict provoked predictable amounts of bemusement, dissatisfied grumbling and
outright hostility from certain parts of the audience, but the success of his
staging lay in the fact that its arguments and its action effectively occupied
two separate layers, both equally considered and neither fighting for dominance
over the other. If the provocative imagery enriched our understanding of Aida’s
thematic possibilities, Mr Bieito’s handling of the characters made it easy to
appreciate the opera as a series of tense confrontations fired by a clearly
defined structure of mutually exclusive desires; for all the staging’s
intellectual investigations, it did not deny us the pleasure of Amneris
finessing the truth from Aida in the second act, nor the sequence of betrayals
that powers the third.
The
dramatic force of the evening owed much to Mr Bieito’s sense of concentrated
physical action, but was elevated at every turn by the strength and versatility
of the singers; and while the production could boast a distinguished cast, it
was Elīna Garanča who, as Amneris, staked out an unassailable position at its
moral and dramatic centre. The captivating quality of her performance owed less
to raw power than to the endless flexibility and subtleties of phrasing that
yielded scene after scene of arresting intensity. She was the dominant force in
the first part of the second act, mixing scorn and suspicion with an obvious
delight at the emotional power she was able to wield over Aida, but it was in
the fourth act that she revealed the full spectrum of her character: the angry
desperation in her scene with Radamès and her tormented anticipation as she
awaited the verdict of the priests were all the more powerful for being built
upon a foundation of bruised humanity.
Marina
Rebeka, in the ‘Ritorna vincitor’ scene, delineated Aida’s inner struggle with
great assurance, albeit with little of the meek hopelessness that the scene
sometimes invites, and the moment in the second act when Aida discovers that
Radamès is still alive was communicated to the audience with all the necessary
ecstasy. Her performance, however, seemed to switch into a higher gear in the
third act, starting with a deeply moving ‘O patria mia’ and continuing through
a sequence of increasingly charged scenes with Amonasro and Radamès. While she
was convincingly spectral in her delicate contribution to ‘O terra, addio’, it
was the tortured passions of the third act that made the greatest impression.
It
was apparent from his first appearance that Yusif Eyvazov’s impressively large
voice required little effort to fill the auditorium; but while his projective
power yielded impressive results in the finale of the first act – in which his
lines, clear and wholly without strain, floated easily above the massed forces
of the choir and orchestra – or in the sextet of the second act, it left little
room for the moments of sensitivity that can transform Radamès into something
more than just a flawed hero. His ‘Celeste Aida’ was indisputably mighty, but
it conveyed little in the way of tenderness, as though the prospect of military
victory and romantic fulfilment were not really all that different. One was
more convinced by his surrender to the priests at the end of the third act than
his surprisingly full-bodied farewell to the world that concluded the opera.
Gabriele Viviani, however, provided the evening with an Amonasro of chilling
depth and remarkable agility; and René Pape was a superb Ramfis, endlessly
graceful in his phrasing and tone, and wholly commanding as a presence on
stage.
The
musical direction of Nicola Luisotti was pleasingly unforced, allowing Verdi’s
score to rise and fall with few hints of obvious intervention. If there were no
conspicuous liberties of pace or phrasing, there were perhaps a handful of
moments that seemed to demand a more vigorous approach: the chorus midway
through the first act didn’t quite capture the nervous excitement of impending
war, while the somewhat leisurely triumphal march and ballet in the second
act, despite some nice playing from the (onstage) trumpets, never quite
caught fire. Such moments, however, were balanced by a natural feel for the
dramatic shape of each act: it is doubtful that the musically magnificent third
act would have reached such a peak of intensity without Mr Luisotti’s assured guidance.
For all that Mr Bieito’s staging was determined to pursue its own agenda of
social and moral decline, Mr Luisotti ensured that the evening remained firmly
anchored in the familiar pleasures of Verdi’s music.
Comentarios