Alemania
Bruckner 200Something More
Jesse Simon
The 200th anniversary of Bruckner’s birth has given listeners throughout Europe a welcome chance to hear many of the lesser-performed works from the composer’s symphonic corpus: in Berlin alone audiences had the opportunity to experience the two unnumbered symphonies – along with the oft-neglected First – under the baton of Christian Thielemann, while a recent concert with Simone Young made a strong case for the original version of the Second. After a year of worthy curious and minor revelations, however, it was a pleasure to return to some of the symphonies on which Bruckner’s reputation for monumentality rests.
It was the Eighth, Bruckner’s final
completed masterpiece, that served as the sole work on the program of Andris
Nelsons’ most recent guest appearance with the Berlin Philharmonic. Given Mr
Nelsons’ credentials as a Bruckner interpreter – his recent cycle with the
Gewandhausorchester is among the finer of the current century – the
chances of hearing a memorable performance were fairly high. Yet the evening
ended up being something more: without speeding through or stretching out,
without glossing over the work’s oddities or placing undue emphasis on its
vastness, Mr Nelsons offered a reading that captured the symphony’s singular
dramatic sweep. With the various sections of the orchestra playing at the peak
of their powers, it was a performance that emphasised the work’s symphonic
unity while gaining in distinction and intensity with each successive movement.
The opening bars, while not unduly swift,
proceeded with a notable sense of purpose, and the first entry of the low
strings – elegantly shaped by a subtle dynamic swell – came with a welcome edge
of foreboding. By the time the first tutti had faded, the audience had a fairly
good idea of what to expect from the evening: the sound of the massed strings
was pleasingly substantial, and the trombones – positioned centre stage behind
the woodwinds – delivered concentrated statements of tremendous depth; if the first
quartet of horns had an earthier, less lofty tone than one is used to hearing,
the second quartet provided frequent demonstrations of the Wagner tuba’s
capacity for majestic solemnity.
As great as the individual sections
sounded, it was the finely-considered balance of the orchestra as a whole that
made the greater impression: the brass, even at their most emphatic, never
threatened to crush the strings – although when they did have something
important to impart they did so with remarkable conviction – while the
woodwinds were woven effortlessly into the symphony’s ever-shifting textures.
If Mr Nelsons had a definite idea of how a Bruckner orchestra should sound, he had
an equally compelling vision of how such wide-ranging score could be fashioned
into a coherent whole. In the first movement the transitions between sections
were seamless, and shifts in tempo were accomplished with great subtlety; without
ever sounding rushed or cursory, Mr Nelsons allowed the movement’s disparate
episodes to emerge as a tautly constructed narrative.
The Scherzo, while lacking neither pace nor
momentum, seemed concerned less with incisive rhythms than with the overall
sonic impact, although the spirited brass exclamations in the outer sections
made the calm of the trio all the more pronounced. However even the finest
moments of the first two movements were merely a warm-up for the titanic drama
of the third. From the very outset, Mr Nelsons was intent on creating an
atmosphere of deep reverence; but, as in the first movement, his moderately
broad tempi came with no slackening of focus. Indeed his patient handling of
the individual episodes gave the movement a heightened mood of apprehension and
excitement.
The orchestra responded to Mr Nelsons’ approach
with rapt concentration and an elegance of playing bordering on sublime: the
strings were even more luminous than in the opening movements, and the
unfailingly sturdy Wagner tubas were responsible for countless astonishing
moments. If the full ensemble in the movement’s climactic passages was as
impressive for its clarity as for its power of expression – there was no hint
of harshness or mere loudness – the introspective passages were no less
captivating. When the violins and Wagner tubas brought the movement to its
hushed conclusion, one was left with the sense of having undertaken an immense
transformative journey.
By the time the final movement began, both
orchestra and conductor were completely locked in: the rhythmic vitality only
hinted at in the Scherzo was on prominent display in the galloping opening bars,
and even some of the quieter passages were animated with a subtle urgency. For
the most part Mr Nelsons’ reading of the Finale presented Bruckner at his most
extrovert, conjuring masses of orchestral sound designed to overwhelm the
listener with their grandeur; yet so great was Mr Nelsons’ sense of balance that
even in the ecstatic final bars one could still distinguish the overlapping
brass parts that brought the symphony to its triumphant conclusion.
Although Bruckner’s unique approach to the symphony eventually found acceptance late in his lifetime, he might not have imagined that his corpus would still be so celebrated two-hundred years after his birth. But if the intervening years have made his works familiar, they have not quite been able to diminish the strangeness of his vision. The Eighth offers perhaps the most fully-realised expression of that vision, and when one is fortunate enough to experience a performance as great as the one given on the evening by Andris Nelsons and the Berlin Philharmonic, it is impossible to emerge from the concert hall unmoved.
Comentarios